“We told you that Israel is against peace,” reminded us a French NGO, after the announcement of the new construction.
“Israel prefers to keep entrenching its occupation, expanding its illegal settlements, and devouring Palestinian land, rather than pursue a genuine peace with the Palestinians on the basis of UN Resolutions and International Law.” Cries SABEEL – and NGO sponsored by the Swedish and Dutch governments – in their annual Christmas message.
“Bethlehem, a city of peace, has been disfigured by tanks and soldiers on its streets,” reads the back of a Christmas card issued by War on Want, which receives British government funding.
One might be forgiven to believe that it’s values like peace, justice, and human rights that motivated these statements.
But if peace is their genuine goal, why don’t they mention Hamas leader, Mr. Haniyeh, who reiterated in his speech a few weeks ago that Hamas will keep fighting Israel until it is annihilated. Isn’t he an obstacle to the peace process? If you have any thoughts with regards to where by and how to use Lamar – visit the up coming webpage – , you can contact us at our page.
If justice is the motivation, shouldn’t they mention, at least in a side note, the number of ‘City of Peace’-originated suicide bombers responsible for the killing of dozen Israel civilians.
And if human right is what they care about, aren’t they missing the largest civilian massacre in the modern history of the middle east. A massacre of 45,000 Syrians that is still taking place at this very moment.
But it’s not truth, peace and justice that they care about. Those are merely excuses for the relentless anti-Israeli attacks that have been going on since the inception of Israel, regardless of what the Israel’s policy of the time might have been.
But it’s high time to call these organizations to reconsider their position. After all, with the worrisome changes undergoing Israel, it’s slipping down the slope of becoming less democratic, more politically extreme and more religious – the very values practiced by the countries these NGOs have been embracing when attacking Israel. If Israel became like Syria, for instance, would it free its attackers to focus on where they are needed the most, like Congo, where monthly 40,000 war-related deaths have already consumed more than 6 million lives?